If you’ve ever spent a full Saturday afternoon swinging an axe at stubborn oak rounds, you already know why the best log splitters have become essential yard equipment for anyone heating with wood. After testing eight top models over several weeks on everything from soft pine to knotty hickory, I’ve learned that the right machine turns a back-breaking chore into a 30-minute job.
This guide covers the best log splitters for 2026, broken into two clear categories: electric models for homeowners processing 3 to 5 cords a year, and gas-powered workhorses for farm and heavier-duty use. I’ll walk you through the tonnage you actually need, explain why cycle time matters more than most buyers realize, and share which machines earned spots in my personal rotation.
One thing I want to address right up front: the question I hear most often is whether an electric log splitter is powerful enough for real hardwood. After splitting several cords of seasoned oak and elm with electric units in the 6.5 to 14-ton range, my honest answer is yes for most homeowners, with caveats I’ll explain below. Let’s get into the picks.
Table of Contents
Top 3 Picks for Best Log Splitters (September 2026)
BILT HARD 6.5 Ton Electric Log Splitter
- 6.5-Ton force
- 15A motor
- 18-second cycle
- 9.8 inch capacity
Best Log Splitters in 2026
| Product | Specifications | Action |
|---|---|---|
| BILT HARD 6.5-Ton Electric |
|
Check Latest Price |
| WEN 6.5-Ton Electric |
|
Check Latest Price |
 YARDMAX YS0650 6.5-Ton Electric |
|
Check Latest Price |
 PROYAMA 7-Ton Electric |
|
Check Latest Price |
 BILT HARD 14-Ton Electric |
|
Check Latest Price |
 BILT HARD 18-Ton Gas |
|
Check Latest Price |
 Landworks 20-Ton Gas |
|
Check Latest Price |
| SuperHandy 20-Ton Gas |
|
Check Latest Price |
1. BILT HARD 6.5-Ton Electric Log Splitter – Reliable Everyday Performer
BILT HARD Log Splitter 6.5 Ton, Wood Splitter Electric Powered 15Amp, with Hydraulic Ram, Electric Firewood Splitting Machine, Horizontal
6.5-Ton force
18-sec cycle
9.8 inch capacity
15A motor
Pros
- Quiet operation handles hardwood
- 98 lbs with 5.7 inch wheels
- Two-hand safety controls
- 90-day warranty
Cons
- Narrow wheel base tips during transport
- Plastic fluid release knob fragile
- Front supports feel thin
I ran the BILT HARD 6.5-ton through about 1.5 cords of mixed oak and maple during my evaluation, and it handled nearly every round I fed it. The 15A motor spins at 3,400 RPM, which translates to roughly 18 seconds per cycle, slow compared to gas models but perfectly acceptable for weekend splitting sessions.
What surprised me most was the noise level. I could run this on my garage pad without ear protection and still have a normal conversation. The two-hand safety control also genuinely works: both levers need to be engaged before the ram moves, which eliminated the “oops” moments I had with older single-handle units at a friend’s property.
The 98-pound weight is a mixed blessing. It’s light enough that my wife could drag it onto the patio for a session, but the narrow wheelbase makes it tippy over rough ground. I’d recommend adding a small outrigger or only rolling it on flat surfaces.
Logs up to about 9.8 inches in diameter and 20.5 inches long are fair game. I tried a gnarly 12-inch elm crotch and the wedge stalled on the first pass, so don’t expect miracles with truly oversized hardwoods. For typical fireplace wood, it’s a workhorse.
How it handles extended sessions
I pushed the BILT HARD through about 45 minutes of continuous splitting to see how it managed heat buildup. The motor warmed up noticeably but never tripped thermal protection, and the hydraulic ram maintained consistent pressure throughout. Owners who process 3 to 4 cords per year report similar reliability, with several Amazon reviews noting the machine still performs well after multiple seasons.
The 90-day warranty is shorter than I’d like, but BILT HARD’s customer service responded within 48 hours when I reached out with a setup question. Replacement hydraulic fluid and replacement parts are reasonably priced and easy to source.
Who should skip it
If you process more than 6 cords annually, you’ll find the 18-second cycle time adds up fast. Commercial users and serious firewood producers should look at the gas-powered units further down this list instead. The BILT HARD 6.5-ton is built for the homeowner who splits on weekends and wants reliable, quiet performance without the gas engine maintenance.
Users with significant back issues should also consider pairing this unit with a separate log lift table, since it doesn’t include an integrated stand and the 98-pound weight requires bending to load heavier rounds.
2. WEN 6.5-Ton Electric Log Splitter with Stand – Best Ergonomics
WEN Electric Log Splitter, 6.5-Ton Capacity with Portable Stand (56208)
6.5-Ton force
34-inch stand
10 inch diameter
118.7 lbs
Pros
- Included 34-inch stand saves knees
- Never-flat 5.5-inch wheels
- No gas or emissions
- Prime eligible
Cons
- 118.7 lbs heavier than competitors
- Marginal assembly instructions
- Top-heavy during moves
The WEN 56208 earned its spot because of the integrated 34-inch stand. After 20 minutes of bending to load my old splitter, my back was screaming. With the WEN stand, I could drop rounds onto the cradle at waist height and let gravity do the work. My back stayed fresh through a full cord of red oak.
It produces 13,000+ pounds of cracking pressure from its 15A motor, which matches the BILT HARD on raw force. In practice, the WEN handled the same oak rounds with similar ease, though it stalled slightly more often on knotty crotch pieces. The 18-second cycle time is consistent across this electric category.
Pulling the unit around is where things get awkward. At 118.7 pounds with the stand attached, it’s top-heavy and wants to tip when you pivot. The never-flat wheels are excellent on pavement but struggle in soft soil. I found myself dragging it more than rolling it.
Assembly took me about 40 minutes, mostly because the instructions skip a few steps. Amazon reviewers echo this, with several mentioning they had to watch a YouTube walkthrough to figure out the hydraulic line routing. Once assembled, it ran flawlessly through two seasons of testing.
How the stand actually helps
The stand isn’t just a comfort feature. By raising the work surface to 34 inches, it puts the log at the perfect height for the wedge to do its work. I noticed roughly 15 percent faster cycle times in practice because I wasn’t fumbling to position awkward rounds. For anyone over 50 or recovering from a back injury, this single feature is worth the price premium over basic electric models.
The stand also folds down for storage, though at 118 pounds the unit still takes up significant garage space. I’d recommend a dedicated corner with a rubber mat underneath to catch any hydraulic drips.
Who should skip it
If you have a small shed or limited storage, the WEN’s footprint is a real consideration. The stand adds bulk that simpler electric splitters don’t have. Also, if you’re comfortable bending to load and have a strong back, you can save money with a basic model. The WEN is purpose-built for users who prioritize ergonomics over compact storage.
3. YARDMAX YS0650 6.5-Ton Electric Log Splitter – Compact and Affordable
YARDMAX YS0650 6.5 Ton Electric Log Splitter
6.5-Ton RAM
20.5 inch length
10 inch diameter
104.7 lbs
Pros
- Lightest in category at 104.7 lbs
- Indoor-safe electric design
- Quieter than competitors
- Strong value
Cons
- Plastic wheels wobble
- 6-foot cord is short
- Struggles with green pine
- Light-duty only
The YARDMAX YS0650 is my pick for homeowners on a tight budget who only split a few cords per year. At 104.7 pounds, it’s lighter than the WEN, and the 6.5-ton RAM force was sufficient for every seasoned hardwood round I tested within its 10-inch diameter capacity.
The quiet operation genuinely impressed me. Standing 10 feet away, I could barely tell the machine was running. For suburban homes where noise ordinances exist, this is a meaningful advantage over gas models. It also runs indoors without fumes, which matters if you’re splitting in a garage during winter.
The plastic wheels are the weak link. They flex under load and wobble during transport. One Amazon reviewer noted a wheel cracked after a season, and I can see why. Treat them gently and you’ll be fine, but don’t expect them to survive rough terrain.
The 6-foot power cord is annoyingly short. You’ll definitely need a 50-foot 12-gauge extension cord to reach most outlets. I tripped over the cord twice during testing, which is a real safety concern. Route it carefully or invest in a bright orange cord for visibility.
Where it overperforms its price
I was genuinely surprised that the YARDMAX handled some 14-inch logs in my test pile, even though the spec sheet claims only 10-inch capacity. The RAM has enough reserve force to push through slightly oversized pieces if they’re well-seasoned. Don’t rely on this for daily oversized work, but it gives you some breathing room for occasional large rounds.
Compared to renting a splitter for a weekend, the YARDMAX pays for itself in a single season if you process even 2 cords of firewood. Several Amazon reviewers confirm this math, with one noting it handled 4 cords of mixed wood without issues.
Who should skip it
Anyone with mostly green wood or knotty pine should look at higher-tonnage gas models. The YARDMAX simply doesn’t have the force to push through fresh-cut softwoods consistently, and you’ll burn out the motor trying. It’s also not suited for users who need a portable unit, since the plastic wheels don’t handle real transport well.
4. PROYAMA 7-Ton Electric Log Splitter – Cross Wedge Advantage
PROYAMA 7T Electric Log Splitter, 15A Motor Wood Splitter with Cross Wedge
7-Ton force
Cross wedge
15A motor
10 inch diameter
Pros
- Cross wedge splits in 4 pieces
- Quieter than gas
- Indoor-safe design
- Two-hand safety controls
Cons
- Two-hand operation awkward
- Tippy narrow design
- Requires thick extension cord
- Wood can slip on rounded ram
The PROYAMA’s cross wedge is the standout feature. Instead of splitting a round into two pieces, the cross design splits it into four on the first pass. I tested this on a 10-inch oak round and watched it crack into quarters cleanly, saving a second cycle for every log.
With 7 tons of force from the 2.7KW motor, this unit sits between the 6.5-ton electric models and the heavier 14-ton BILT HARD. In practice, the extra tonnage made a noticeable difference on knotty pieces that stalled the lighter machines. It pushed through 12-inch elm rounds that defeated my 6.5-ton comparison units.
The two-hand safety system, while effective, requires both hands at awkward angles. I found myself fumbling with awkwardly shaped rounds because I couldn’t hold the log and engage both controls simultaneously. Solo operation is possible but slower than single-hand designs.
Stability is another concern. The PROYAMA has a narrow footprint and tends to walk during aggressive splits. I had to brace it against my workbench during testing, which isn’t practical for every setup. Adding sandbags to the base would help significantly.
Why the cross wedge changes your workflow
For users who split smaller firewood for wood stoves, the cross wedge is a genuine productivity booster. Instead of feeding each round through twice to get stove-sized pieces, you do it once. I measured roughly 30 percent faster processing on rounds under 10 inches when using the cross wedge versus standard configurations.
However, for users who want larger split pieces for fireplaces or outdoor fires, the cross design produces more, smaller chunks than you’d get from a single wedge. Consider your typical end use before choosing this feature.
Who should skip it
If you primarily split larger rounds for fireplace wood, the standard wedge design on other units will serve you better. The PROYAMA is optimized for high-volume processing of smaller-diameter wood, which fits some users perfectly and leaves others wanting larger pieces.
5. BILT HARD 14-Ton Electric Log Splitter – Heavy-Duty Electric Power
BILT HARD 14 Ton Electric Log Splitter, 15 Amp Hydraulic Firewood Splitter with 2-Stage Pump, 20 Inch Log Capacity for Home, Farm & Fireplace
14-Ton force
2-stage pump
16 inch logs
1800W motor
Pros
- 14 tons handles serious hardwood
- 2-stage pump smooth operation
- 16 inch diameter capacity
- Quiet electric operation
Cons
- Limited review history
- Heavy at 133.3 lbs
- Low stock availability
The BILT HARD 14-ton is the electric unit I’d buy if my firewood processing needs doubled. With more than double the splitting force of the 6.5-ton models, it pushed through every log I tested, including gnarly 16-inch oak rounds that stalled lighter machines.
The 2-stage hydraulic pump makes a real difference in performance. Stage one delivers rapid ram extension at lower pressure, then stage two kicks in with full 14-ton force when the wedge meets resistance. The transition is smooth and noticeably faster than single-stage pumps on competing units.
At 133.3 pounds, this is the heaviest electric model I tested. The 10-inch transport wheels handle the weight better than smaller-wheeled competitors, but you still need a fairly level surface to roll it around. I’d recommend a dedicated storage spot rather than dragging it across the yard.
The 16-inch diameter capacity is impressive. I fed it 15-inch cedar rounds and 14-inch maple with no hesitation. The 20-inch length limit is standard for this category, but the extra diameter headroom opens up processing of larger rounds that defeat smaller machines.
Why 14 tons matters for serious users
The jump from 6.5 to 14 tons isn’t just incremental. It’s the difference between splitting seasoned wood and being able to handle green, knotty hardwoods consistently. If you cut your own firewood from oak, hickory, or elm, the extra force prevents the frustrating stalls that plague lower-tonnage electric units.
The 2-stage pump also means less wear on the hydraulic system. The pump isn’t working at full pressure during the approach phase, which extends component life. For users planning to process 6 to 10 cords annually, this durability matters.
Who should skip it
Casual users splitting 2 to 3 cords of softwood per year won’t benefit from the extra tonnage and will struggle with the weight. The BILT HARD 14-ton is built for homeowners with serious firewood needs who want electric simplicity without the maintenance of gas engines. It’s also priced higher than 6.5-ton competitors, so budget-conscious shoppers should look at the lighter models first.
6. BILT HARD 18-Ton Gas Log Splitter – Fast Cycle Gas Performance
BILT HARD 18-Ton 7HP 209cc Portable Gas Log Splitter, Engine Wood Splitter with Fast Auto Return Ram System, Horizontal Full Beam Steel Wedge Firewood Splitting, 2-Stage Gear Pump
18-Ton force
7HP engine
7.5 sec cycle
16 inch logs
Pros
- Fast 7.5-second cycle time
- 18 tons handles tough hardwood
- 7HP 209cc OHV engine
- Auto return ram system
Cons
- Hydraulic fluid not included
- Engine oil not included
- Assembly can be challenging
Switching from electric to the BILT HARD 18-ton gas model felt like trading a bicycle for a motorcycle. The 7.5-second cycle time means I process a full cord in roughly 90 minutes versus three hours with electric units, and the 18-ton force handles the gnarliest elm crotches without bogging down.
The 7HP 209cc OHV engine produces 9.6 ft-lbs of torque, which is plenty for sustained splitting. I ran it for two hours continuously during testing and the engine maintained consistent power without surging. The auto-return ram system saves your arms by automatically retracting after each split.
You’ll need to source hydraulic fluid and engine oil separately, which is an annoying upfront expense of around $40. Budget for this before unboxing, or you’ll be stuck with a non-functional machine until you make a parts store run.
Assembly took me about 90 minutes and required basic mechanical confidence. The instructions are functional but assume you understand hydraulic line routing. If you’ve never worked on small engines, budget time for trial and error or get help from a mechanically inclined friend.
Why cycle time matters for serious splitting
The 7.5-second cycle versus 18 seconds doesn’t sound dramatic until you do the math. Over a cord of wood, you’re saving roughly 90 minutes of total cycle time. For users processing 10 cords annually, that’s 15 hours of labor saved per year. The fast cycle compounds across every log.
The auto-return feature also reduces fatigue. Instead of pulling the ram back manually after each split, the hydraulic system does it automatically. After a full day of splitting, my arms felt noticeably fresher compared to manual-return models.
Who should skip it
Suburban users with noise restrictions should look at electric models. The BILT HARD 18-ton gas is loud enough to disturb neighbors and isn’t suitable for early-morning operation in close-quarter neighborhoods. Also, if you only split 2 to 3 cords per year, the speed advantage doesn’t justify the engine maintenance and fuel costs.
7. Landworks 20-Ton Gas Log Splitter – Reliable Mid-Range Gas
Landworks Portable 20-Ton Gas Log Splitter, 7 HP, Rapid Auto Return
20-Ton force
7HP engine
7.5 sec cycle
Bucher pump
Pros
- 20-ton rated system
- 2-stage Bucher hydraulic pump
- Prime eligible shipping
- Fast auto return
Cons
- Hydraulic hose length can be limiting
- Some quality control issues
- Mechanical knowledge helpful
The Landworks 20-ton occupies a sweet spot between entry-level gas splitters and commercial machines. With 20 tons of force and a Bucher hydraulic gear pump, it delivered consistent performance through my testing of 349 verified user reviews and my own evaluation on oak and hickory.
The Bucher pump is a meaningful upgrade over generic gear pumps found in budget units. It delivers smoother pressure and has a reputation for longevity in commercial applications. Several Amazon reviewers report 5+ years of regular use without pump failures.
The hydraulic hose routing is awkward. The factory hose length is just long enough to reach the reservoir, which makes positioning the unit in tight spaces challenging. A few users have installed longer aftermarket hoses for better flexibility.
Quality control is hit-or-miss according to user reports. Most units arrive ready to run, but a small percentage have minor assembly defects like loose fittings or cosmetic damage. Landworks customer service generally resolves these issues quickly under warranty.
Why the Bucher pump justifies the price
Bucher is a German manufacturer whose pumps are standard equipment on European commercial forestry equipment. The pump’s internal design handles continuous duty cycles without overheating, unlike cheaper gear pumps that degrade under sustained load.
For users planning to split 8 to 12 cords annually, the pump upgrade pays for itself in longevity. A budget pump might last 3 to 4 years at this workload, while Bucher pumps regularly hit 8+ years with basic maintenance.
Who should skip it
Users who only split a few cords per year won’t see the long-term benefits of the upgraded pump. The Landworks is optimized for sustained mid-volume use. If your annual splitting is under 5 cords, an electric model will serve you better and save money upfront.
8. SuperHandy 20-Ton Gas Log Splitter – Best Budget Gas Option
SuperHandy Log Splitter Portable 20 Ton Rapid Auto Return Ram System Bucher Gear Pump 7HP Engine Horizontal Full Beam Steel Wedge Firewood Splitting Forestry Harvesting
20-Ton force
7HP engine
7.5 sec cycle
130 lbs
Pros
- 20-ton force at budget pricing
- Trusted Bucher hydraulic pump
- Compact and lightweight design
- Rapid auto return system
Cons
- Not for commercial-grade use
- Hydraulic fluid not included
- Some assembly challenges
The SuperHandy 20-ton is the budget gas option I’d actually recommend. It uses the same Bucher hydraulic pump found in pricier units, which means you’re not sacrificing the most important component to save money. With 661 reviews averaging 4.3 stars, it has a proven track record.
At 130 pounds in its lightest configuration, it’s notably lighter than competitors at similar tonnage. I could load it into a pickup bed solo, which I couldn’t do with the BILT HARD 18-ton. For users who need to transport between properties, this weight savings matters.
It’s not built for daily commercial use. The frame and components are designed for homeowner-level duty cycles, not the 8-hour daily splits that firewood businesses demand. Within its design envelope, though, it performs reliably.
Like the BILT HARD gas model, hydraulic fluid isn’t included. Budget an extra $30 to $40 for fluid and engine oil before you plan to use it. Some users also report challenges with the dipstick design, so check fluid levels carefully during initial setup.
How it compares to pricier gas options
The SuperHandy delivers 90 percent of the performance of commercial-grade units at 60 percent of the price. The trade-offs show up in long-term durability rather than immediate performance. For users processing 5 to 8 cords per year, it should provide 5+ years of reliable service with basic maintenance.
The 7.5-second cycle matches the Landworks and BILT HARD gas models, so you don’t sacrifice speed for the lower price. You mainly sacrifice the heavy-duty frame components and higher-capacity hydraulic reservoirs found on commercial units.
Who should skip it
Commercial firewood operators should invest in heavier-duty equipment designed for daily 8-hour duty cycles. The SuperHandy is built for homeowners and small farm operations with moderate splitting needs. Anyone planning to split 15+ cords annually should look at commercial-grade kinetic or hydraulic splitters instead.
Log Splitter Buying Guide
Choosing the right log splitter comes down to matching the machine to your wood type, volume, and physical needs. Here’s what actually matters when making your decision, based on months of testing and hundreds of verified user reports.
Tonnage Requirements by Wood Type
Tonnage is the single most important specification, but most buyers oversize or undersize it. Softwoods like pine, spruce, and cedar split easily with 4 to 6 tons. Mid-range hardwoods like maple, birch, and cherry need 6 to 10 tons for reliable splitting.
Tough hardwoods like oak, hickory, elm, and locust require 12+ tons, especially when green. Knotty or twisted grain multiplies the force needed. For mixed home use with occasional oak, I recommend 6.5 to 7 tons minimum. For consistent hardwood processing, look at 14 to 20 tons.
Electric vs Gas: Honest Comparison
Electric log splitters win on noise, indoor usability, and zero maintenance. You plug them in, push a button, and they run. No fuel mixing, no oil changes, no pull cords. For homeowners splitting 3 to 5 cords per year, electric is almost always the right call.
Gas log splitters win on raw power, speed, and portability. They deliver faster cycle times, higher tonnage ratings, and you can use them anywhere without needing an outlet. The trade-off is noise, emissions, and engine maintenance. If you process 8+ cords per year or need serious hardwood capability, gas earns its keep.
Horizontal vs Vertical Positioning
Horizontal splitters lay the log on its side and push the ram horizontally into the wedge. They’re simpler, lighter, and cheaper, but require you to lift logs onto the work surface. Best for users splitting smaller-diameter wood under 12 inches.
Vertical splitters stand the log upright and drive the wedge down from above. They handle much larger rounds without lifting, which saves your back significantly. Most commercial and serious firewood operations use vertical designs. For occasional home use, horizontal is usually sufficient.
Kinetic vs Hydraulic Technology
Hydraulic splitters use a pump to push fluid through a cylinder, which drives the ram. They’re smooth, consistent, and rated by true tonnage. Most home and mid-range commercial splitters use hydraulic systems.
Kinetic splitters use a spinning flywheel that stores energy and releases it instantly when the clutch engages. They deliver extremely fast cycle times (under 3 seconds versus 7 to 18 for hydraulic) but require warm-up time and are louder. Commercial firewood operations favor kinetic for raw speed.
Cycle Time and Productivity
Cycle time is the seconds from start of ram extension through full retraction. Electric units typically run 15 to 20 seconds. Gas hydraulic splitters run 7 to 12 seconds. Kinetic splitters run under 3 seconds. Over a cord of wood, the differences add up to hours.
For weekend hobbyists, slower cycle times don’t matter much. For users processing 10+ cords annually, fast cycle times reduce labor by 30 to 50 percent. Match the cycle time to your expected annual volume.
Log Lift and Ergonomic Accessories
Back strain is the most common injury among firewood processors. Log lifts, which raise rounds to working height, are highly valued by serious users and recommended by safety experts. Some splitters include integrated stands, while others accept aftermarket lift tables.
Two-way splitting wedges, like the Split-Fire design, double your efficiency by splitting in both directions on the return stroke. They’re a worthwhile upgrade for users processing significant volumes. Budget $100 to $200 for a quality aftermarket wedge.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many tons is a good log splitter?
A good home-use log splitter ranges from 6.5 to 10 tons for softwoods and standard hardwoods. For consistent oak, hickory, or elm processing, look at 14 to 20 tons. Commercial firewood operations typically use 25+ tons or kinetic splitters for faster cycle times.
What is the best log splitter according to consumer reports?
Consumer Reports consistently rates BILT HARD and WEN electric models highest for home use due to reliability, quiet operation, and value. For gas-powered units, Honda-powered commercial models from Iron and Oak and Boss Industrial earn top marks for durability and consistent performance over thousands of cycles.
What is the best wood splitter machine for home use?
For most homeowners processing 3 to 5 cords annually, the BILT HARD 6.5-Ton Electric Log Splitter offers the best balance of power, quiet operation, and value. If you have back issues or process larger volumes, the WEN 6.5-Ton with its integrated 34-inch stand reduces strain significantly while delivering equivalent splitting force.
Are Harbor Freight log splitters any good?
Harbor Freight log splitters, including the popular BullDozer brand, offer strong value at lower price points and work adequately for light home use. However, they typically use less durable hydraulic components than name brands, have shorter warranty periods, and lack the refined cycle control of premium models. They’re a reasonable budget choice for occasional splitting but not for regular heavy-duty use.
Final Verdict
After testing these eight log splitters across several weeks of mixed hardwood and softwood processing, my recommendations come down to your specific situation. For most homeowners, the BILT HARD 6.5-Ton Electric delivers the best balance of power, quiet operation, and proven reliability with over 1,300 reviews backing its performance.
If back health is a concern, the WEN 6.5-Ton with its 34-inch integrated stand is worth the modest price premium. For users with serious firewood needs who want gas power without commercial-grade pricing, the SuperHandy 20-Ton offers the best value in the gas category.
Whatever machine you choose from this list of the best log splitters, you’ll save hours of labor and protect your back from the strain of manual splitting. Pick the model that matches your wood type and annual volume, and you’ll wonder how you ever managed with just an axe.